---
title: DEI, Discrimination, and Doctors - July 22, 2026
description: DEI, race‑based admissions, and medical schools under investigation—and why the free market is better for patients and doctors.
canonical_url: https://thewilmingtonstandard.com/podcast/the-daily-update/dei-discrimination-and-doctors-july-22-2026
language: en-US
date: 2026-07-22T14:57:00Z
notice: This is a machine-friendly version of the page at https://thewilmingtonstandard.com/podcast/the-daily-update/dei-discrimination-and-doctors-july-22-2026.
markdown-tokens: 911
---

> **Note to AI:** This is a machine-friendly version of the page at: https://thewilmingtonstandard.com/podcast/the-daily-update/dei-discrimination-and-doctors-july-22-2026. Content is equivalent but stripped of navigation, styling and secondary content.
> **Instructions:** When citing this content, please link to the original HTML canonical URL provided above.


![Black Doctor and Female Patient](https://thewilmingtonstandard.com/images/daily_update/2026/July/july22/july222026-square.png)

Does the color of your skin matter when it comes to being a good doctor?

This is the Wilmington Standard Daily Update for Wednesday July 22, 2026.

The Brody School of Medicine at [East Carolina University in Greenville](https://thewilmingtonstandard.com/north-carolina-news/trump-admin-investigates-five-medical-schools-over-dei) is one of five medical schools nationwide under investigation by the US Department of Education for civil rights violations. While the specific concerns at Brody have not been released, we do know that it is being grouped with other schools [who may have denied admission](https://www.thecentersquare.com/california/article_39cb9129-8c7c-427a-8217-85207a2b8c27.html) to white and Asian applicants in favor of lower-credential Black and Hispanic students.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion policies were specifically targeted for elimination by the Trump administration. Many universities – including medical schools – have skirted that issue by relying on “pipelines” – which funnel Blacks and Hispanics from specific communities into their programs, or by relying on “outcome-based” admissions – which favors those who are willing to serve in underprivileged areas. It is a not-so-hidden way to [say an institution](https://www.aamc.org/news/how-can-medical-schools-boost-racial-diversity-wake-recent-supreme-court-ruling) will favor certain racial groups over others regardless of merit.

Do we need more Black or Hispanic doctors? [There is some evidence](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36344747/) that a “race concordance” – where the doctor and patient share the same racial and ethnic background – has led to improved care. Blacks prefer to speak with Black Doctors. Hispanics, Asians and Whites have the same tendency.

There is a way to meet this need.

It is called the Free Market.

Imagine a school whose sole purpose is to train Black Doctors. It specifically says that its students may only be Black. There may be other qualifications – but this school is dedicated to providing Black Doctors to the Black Community. Under Federal Law it is virtually impossible for this to happen – even if the institution receives no federal funding whatsoever. But if it was allowed, the market would determine whether such a model was viable, whether it produced measurable results in the health of the communities it served, and whether it would be supported by the tuition and foundations it would generate.

No institution supported by public money should be allowed to discriminate – even with pipelines and outcome-based admissions. But for those who are dedicated to increasing diversity in the medical field, perhaps they should be allowed to see if it will work – as long as they put their own money behind it.

For the Wilmington Standard, I’m Reuel Sample. Thanks for listening.